media/영화 산책

Babies

Sr.Julia 2010. 5. 18. 11:17

 

 

 아프리카 베이비 포니자오(양)

 

 몽고 베이비 바야르(군)

 

 일본 베이비 (메리양)

 

 미국 베이비 (해티 양)

 

지난 금요일 헬레나수녀님과 함께 극장에 가서 본 영화다.

미국에 와서 처음 극장에 갔었는데 우리나라 보통의 멀티플렉스와 같다.

다만 금요일 오전이어서, 그리고 아이언맨이 개봉한 후라

대부분의 영화관은 아이언맨을 상영하고 있었고

이 영화를 본 사람은 아마 10명 남짓될까..

 

아무튼 영화를 본 소감은 인간의 신비함을 만났다고나 할까..

무엇보다 아프리카 소녀와 몽고 소년의 리얼한 삶은 인간의 고귀함을 또다르게 보게 해주었다.

그렇다.

보통 인간들의 삶의 기준으로 볼 때

아프리카와 몽고의 삶은 고생스러움 자체이다.

물도 없고,

청결, 위생과는 거리가 멀다. (아프리카 아기의 엄마는 아기 응가를 자신의 무릎으로 닦는다....^^;;;)

그럼에도 그들에게는 생생함이 있었다.

그들에게 모든것은 자연그대로였고, 어느것도 제한적인 것이 없이 모든 것과 커뮤니케이션하는 그런 광할함을 지니고 있었다.

 

하지만 일본과 미국의 아기들에게는

태어나자마자 모든 것이 갇힌 상태가 된다.

작은 인큐베이터,

그들만의 작은 침대,

동물도 책안에만 있고, 동물원에 가야지만 볼수 있다.

하지만 그것은 나와는 전혀다른 존재로 두려움을 느끼게 하는 것들일뿐이다.

 

샤워기로 부모의 품안에서 몸을 씻는 일본과 미국의 아기와는 달리

바야르는 엄마의 젖으로, 포이자르는 엄마의 혀로 얼굴을 씻는다.

상상하면 '어떻게?...'하겠지만 그 장면을 보게 된다면

너무나 숭고하게 여겨질 정도다.

 

이영화를 만든 감독이 의도한 바가 있어서 어떤식의 편집은 분명히 있을 것이다.

하지만 인간의 삶이란게 별다를게 있을까..

다만 어떤 상황을 만들며 사느냐가 주제겠지..

 

영화를 보는 내내 그들의 재롱(!?)들에 많이 웃기도 했지만

물론 속으로는 내가 몽고나 아프리카에 태어나지 않아서 정말 다행이다라는 생각도 했지만..

광활한 대지와 드높고 푸른 하늘을 닮은 그들의 마음과 정신만은 정말 갖고 싶을 정도로 아름다웠다....

 

헬레나 수녀님과 오면서..

누가 가장 귀여웠는지, 재밌는 꼬마였는지, 또 안타까웠는지..얘기했는데

많이 통했다.

대사가 전혀 없는 영화였지만

같은 것을 느낄수 있었다는 것이 이 영화의 매력이 아닐까..

 

다음은 헬레나수녀님이 시카고가톨릭신문에 기고한 영화평이다.

헬레나수녀님의 블로그. http://hellburns.blogspot.com/

한달에 2번 쓴다고 하는데 이번에는 루르드와 베이비였다...

영문이 긴 관계로 관심있으신 분은 해석해보셔도 재미있을듯..^^

 

 

MOVIES: “BABIES”

by Sr. Helena Burns

 

At film school (UCLA) they taught us that we have to "make the audience care" about our characters. Well, with the new documentary "Babies," it's a no-brainer. From the womb to fifteen months old, four babies' lives are chronicled: Two from close-to-nature cultures (Namibia and Mongolia), two from technological environments (Japan and USA). Ponijao from Namibia, Bayar from Mongolia, Mari from Japan, Hattie from the USA. (Bayar is the only boy.)

 

On the heels of popular nature documentaries (kicked off by the successful "March of the Penguins") like "Earth" and "Oceans," "Babies" could almost be seen as a "nature documentary," meaning that human beings are a part of Creation—albeit the crown and wedding of matter-spirit/heaven-earth, but still a part (something that those who exalt nature-over-man or man-over-nature miss, to grievous results). It's very telling that Mari and Hattie spend most of their time indoors, learning about the world from books and technology, while Ponijao and Bayar spend most of their time outdoors, wrangling with the elements. one of my favorite scenes is when Bayar uses a reclining baby goat to get on his feet, and then promptly (inadvertently) steps on the goat's head. Needless to say, there are many patient animals in this film. In fact, there is A LOT of animal interaction, by the filmmakers' distinct choice. Why? Because there's only one thing cuter than babies: babies with animals? Or is there an attempt being made here to place man in his "habitat" which includes other living beings?

 

Ponijao and Bayar and their parents look so comfortable in their own skin, the Japanese family's lifestyle is so highly stylized (in that wonderfully clean-swept, minimalistic, simple, serene, tight, bright Japanese aesthetic) and organized that it looks appealing, the way of life of Hattie from San Francisco (which we have to admit is "us") feels the most forced and out-of-touch somehow. I found myself thinking "thank God" that these other "more human" cultures still exist today. Not "more primitive": more HUMAN. I have to look more into this because I am also a big technophile and total cliff dweller (I LOVE living in a building in the big city). How can we live very humanly, very well WITH our technology?

 

What is the point of this documentary? There is none. Which is extremely fitting, isn't it? Human beings are ends in themselves. We do not serve a "purpose," and neither does this movie need to, as some movie reviewers have suggested. Is it voyeuristic? You bet. Aren't all the visual arts? The show-stealing Bayar is almost four now and has already commented on his own movie: "This is a film about me, the sky [he's not kidding--he lives on an awe-inducing panoramic plain], and how my big brother has been beating me up!" [He's not kidding about the poundings, either.]

 

But voyeuristic is not exploitative. What we have here is babies AS babies, in all their shaky ineptitude, helplessness and heart-melting capabilities. one is really able to observe "the life of babies," the developing little inner life, especially when it comes to conflict! There are baby fights, baby learning curves, baby frustration, baby milestones and baby triumphs. We CAN identify with these pint-sized personalities and imagine ourselves in those tiny shoes (or not: clothes are also optional), back when everything was new and we understood precious little and had to learn fast.

 

The Moms are pretty extraordinary (we see much more of them than the Dads who are also great caregivers). We experience the Moms' incredible gentleness and innate understanding of exactly what each little speechless one needs.

 

"Babies" is arranged loosely according to themes: music, bath time, cats, crawling, standing, walking, exploring, eating (this includes toilet paper a la carte). "Babies" is devoid of chatter, even from the adults. We get to live in the wee ones' wordless world for a short spell, and take life all in, all at once, all over again.

 

As someone once said: "Babies—what a great way to start people."

 

 

OTHER STUFF:

 

 

--Why is "Babies" not in http://www.imdb.com/???? May have something to do with the fact that Focus Features did NOT want "Babies" going viral (!!!), to preserve the movie-going experience(!!!)

 

--Another favorite scene: Bayar's Mom sprays his face with her breast milk and gently cleans off the dirt.

 

--Bayar—in his birthday suit—maneuvers himself atop an upturned tin basin in the midst of a herd of cows, dwarfing him. Hard to believe that the tiny, mostly hairless creature in the amusing shot is actually the master of the universe!

 

--LOTS of breastfeeding.

 

--Most fascinating culture: Mongolian!

 

--Favorite Mom: Ponijao's

 

--Prettiest Mom: Mari's

 

--Funniest baby: Ponijao

 

--Funniest scene: (there are tons, of course) The baby fight—opening scene

 

--"Babies" reminds you what a miracle it is that more kids don't polish themselves off before the age of two. All it takes is looking away from them for one second for them to engage in instant-death-dealing behavior. Thank God for guardian angels.

 

--Some of the greatest shots are when it seems that only the camera is looking.

 

--Most exotic scene: The rooster on Bayar's bed.

 

--Earth mother award: Ponijao's mom

 

--It's amazing how small children sense the slightest affront to their human dignity.

 

--They have Legos in Mongolia.

 

--Where would I choose to be a baby? My own culture (USA) even though we're totally neurotic. It's too late for me. I'm just so used to it. Second choice: Japan, even though Mongolia would probably be the healthiest choice.

 

--If I had to choose a mom for myself? Ponijao's

 

--Hardest place to be a baby: USA

 

--Least number of playdates: Mongolia. Too isolated.

 

--Baby with most complex (or perplexed) facial expression: Hattie

 

--Happiest baby: Bayar

 

--Must-read book to go with "Babies": "The Passion of the Infant Jesus" by Carryl Houselander (aka "Wood of the Cradle, Wood of the Cross," "The Little Way of the Infant Jesus"). Her original title is best: "Passion of the Infant Jesus." It isn't easy being green.

 

--Oriental rugs in each home (except Namibia)

 

--Most picturesque home: Mongolia

 

'media > 영화 산책' 카테고리의 다른 글

위대한 침묵  (0) 2010.12.12
명감독 하느님과 주연배우 쫄리신부님!!  (0) 2010.09.13
Lourdes  (0) 2010.05.18
아바타  (0) 2010.03.07
아고라  (0) 2010.03.07